![]() |
![]() |
| Select WP-13 | July 99 |
| Aiming
for New Safety Thresholds
|
IN THIS ISSUE:
|
| Saturday and Sunday, July 17 & 18, 1999 8:00AM - 4:30 PM (Registration 07:30) Honolulu International Airport InterIsland Terminal, 7th Floor Conference Rooms |
If you fly in Hawaii, or would like to learn more about flying, the Honolulu Flight Standards District Office Wings Weekend at the HNL InterIsland Terminal is the place to be on July 17 and 18, 1999. Heres your chance to learn something new and/or catch up on aviation doings, begin or complete earning your next (or first!) Pilot Proficiency (Wings) Award and spend a great time with other pilots. FREE ADMISSION, with partial parking validations. Scheduled Highlights:
|
ABOUT THE UPCOMING WINGS WEEKEND
|
|
Are never going to involve me, so the next article might be a little more BREAK-BREAK: WRONG THINKING, WRONG ANSWER. The runway incursion hazard has been on the increase the past few years and it happens to major air carriers as well as General Aviation pilots. Which is to say, this is not a dull topic, because were all, everyone who flies or operates on an airport, at risk. Not a week goes by without reading about incursions (plural) at major Airports. Sometimes irritating. Sometimes scary. Sometimes tragic. Does Tenerife sound familiar? NASA, which runs the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), advises that distractions tend to precipitate incursions. The distractions fall into four broad categories, Communications Problems: Use standard phraseology (!) and if you have a question, do ask the controller. Consider the alternatives: no matter how busy they seem to be, theyll like your question a whole lot better than theyll like your busting a taxi clearance. Nobodys immune. Students to ATPs, runway incursions are everybodys problem. Especially, if you find yourself in one of the above four categories, have the discipline to realize youre at risk. |
Although some of this deals with icing, a lot of it is relevant to us here in Hawaii, so were reprinting this NASA letter. For what its worth, I tend to call the authors beckoning patches of blue sky sucker-holes. Suggestion: On the ground, well agree that a rose is a rose is a rose if you remember that in the air a sucker hole is a sucker-hole, is a sucker-hole.
'After considering the options, I decided that flying VFR would allow me the freedom to find a hole in the clouds and get on top in clear air. As we climbed toward the blue patches, it seemed harder and harder to find a hole large enough to climb through. Since it looked like we only needed to climb about another 100 feet to clear the tops, I decided that I would plow on through. Things got worse.
At first the sun poked through occasionally, beckoning us on.
Then it started getting darker, and we picked up a trace of rime ice. Just as I was deciding that we would have to turn back, the engine started surging. I thought carb ice, but carb heat didnt help. As I was trouble-shooting the engine, another aviation demon was sneaking up on us. It turned out that the pitot heat was inoperative and the pitot tube had frozen over. As we were climbing, the airspeed indicator was falsely reading a higher and higher airspeed, and I was gradually compensating (unaware) to stay at Vx indicated airspeed. The plane then began to porpoise, indicating an imminent stall. Just as the stall broke hard, the scenario came together in my mind. We banked at least 90 degrees and I pushed they yoke forward I pulled the throttle back to idle, and recovered from the stall in solid IMC. We broke out in a few minutes and landed VFR.'
The writer points out several lessons: Check pitot heat before potential IMC; carefully monitor weight/balance to preserve stall recovery and avoid the beckoning blue patches between clouds. But remember, in the air its only a sucker hole.
HONOLULU FSDO SAFETY BULLETIN 99-4
Suspected Unapproved Parts (SUPS) may be in your airplane or be in an airplane you fly or maintain. During an ongoing investigation of Life Support Systems, Inc. (Air Agency Number GP4R214M), it has been found that many life vests, rafts, slides, and slide rafts may not have been properly inspected and could fail. The broad scope of the defects found in the inspection, repair, and modification procedures used by this repair station makes all of the work they have performed suspect and questionable. Therefore, all work performed by Life Support Systems Repair Station should be considered as SUPS and be removed from service until verified that it is serviceable. Please take a moment to check yellow tags, work orders, and your maintenance log books to determine if any survival equipment you have (or use) was inspected or repaired by Life Support Systems, Inc. These life vests, slides, and rafts are not considered safe and must be checked before your life depends upon them. If you have questions, or need further information, you may contact FAA Airworthiness Safety Inspector, Darcy Reed at (808) 837-8312.
OLD NEWS - FOOD FOR NEW THOUGHT
One maintenance worker was found guilty of negligent homicide, but four others were acquitted in the 1996 crash of an Aeroperu Boeing 757. This aviation maintenance professional will spend two years in jail for his part in failing to remove adhesive tape covering sensor ports that resulted in inoperative altitude and airspeed indicators. The crew became disoriented and flew the aircraft into the Pacific Ocean 50 miles Northwest of Lima shortly after takeoff. All 70 people aboard were killed and the airline was ordered to pay $29 million to the victims families. The guilty worker claimed the plane crashed because it was sabotaged, even though the tape installed by the maintenance crew prior to cleaning the aircraft was discovered on the ports after the crash.ALSO:
A Federal court in Florida sentenced a 32 year man to 12 years in prison and imposed a $1.3 million fine for robbing repair stations of jet engines, Allison Turbine engine blades and other engine components, and then re-selling the stolen goods. A second man to an 18 month term for his role in the scheme. The jury concluded that the robbed engine and parts had been "laundered" through an FAA-certificated repair station. Some of the stolen components wound up at major parts distributors and airlines, including TWA and Delta, according to the Transportation Department. The penalties given in this case are "some of the stiffest" ever handed out in a Suspected Unapproved Parts (SUPS) case.
The Aviation Safety Program is once again seeking out people who qualify to be recognized as the General Aviation Flight Instructor and Maintenance Technician of the Year. Thats two separate awards. This is a national competition that has been held every year since 1963. Nominees must be active civilian certificated flight instructors, certificated maintenance technicians, or FCC licensed technicians who maintain aviation aircraft or accessories. Nomination application forms are available from the Safety Program Manager(s). The nominations should list as many achievements and specific contributions to aviation as possible .. in 500 words or less. Noteworthy achievement of professional standards will weigh heavy in the selection process. If you know of an airman who is exemplary, please give the SPMs a call to nominate him or her. Once the district selection has been made, the names and applications will be forwarded to the Regional SPMs for further competition at that level. The regional winners will be considered for National recognition with an awards ceremony held in Washington D.C. Travel to the ceremony and all expenses will be provided for each National winner and one guest. Winners and their guests will visit FAA headquarters, attend a luncheon after the ceremony, and enjoy sightseeing opportunities in Washington D.C. Lets kokua this year to gain local, Regional and National recognition for some well deserved aviators and technicians in Hawaii . |
It should not come as a surprise that the predominant factor associated with aircraft accidents today is the human factor. The human element has always overshadowed all other elements; but we are just now beginning to focus our energy in this direction. As a result, we are seeing some changes, although not to the extent where we can show significance. There are many things that make the business of understanding human behavior difficult at best.
In general people are unwilling to admit that they have any deficiencies. If they did, it might encourage the risk of criticism and cause outsiders to wonder why they are allowed to continue being airmen. This results in little or no information about why someone did what they did, or failed to do what they should have done. This is a great dilemma for all aviation. Here are a few suggestions that may help us all to improve:
First, we must feel free to discuss our weaknesses without fear of punishment or retribution. Second, we must improve our understanding of human behavior through human factor training programs. Third, we need better human factor information to improve airman performance.We should seriously consider utilizing human performance data that is available from all available sources. The more we know about past airman performance, the better we will be able to anticipate future airman performance.
Of course, these ideas are oversimplified. However, they are actually quite easy to accomplish. Naturally, getting them done involves change and change is often an uphill battle. But, wouldnt improving the level of safety be well worth that battle?
We all can improve our understanding of human factors by sharing our experiences with one another. A good place to do that is at the FAA WINGS-AMT meetings. Find out when the next one is near you . then attend it and share some of your personal airman knowledge. While youre there, dont forget to pick up a new idea in return.
ALOHA
See you at the next WINGS-AMT meeting.
| Pacific Island Flyer | July 99 |
| Note for all Seminars - No reservations are required unless otherwise noted. - Never a fee. For more information contact the Safety Program Managers listed on the front page. All FAA Safety Seminars satisfy the requirements of AC-61.91H; the Pilot Proficiency Awards Program (Wings) and /or the Aviation Maintenance Technician Awards Program; AC-65-25A. |
No seminars scheduled |
Don't miss it: (see details above) |